How Can We Redesign Dissection Lessons in the High School Life Science Classroom? Considerations for a Meaningful 21st Century Learning Experience

Amanda Marie Mager

Abstract


Dissections in the life science classroom have become less prevalent as science educators have questioned what these experiences teach. Constructivist theorists of education have long suggested redefining the purpose of dissections to better fit the needs of student learning in the 21st century. Using the Next-Generation Science Standards framework, educators can create more meaningful dissections by incorporating opportunities for students to engage in true scientific inquiry. For dissection experiences to be worthwhile and meaningful for students, the activity must be carefully planned and worked into a unit where students can use such an experience to help answer a central unit question. Innovative 21st century dissection activities that allow students to engage in true scientific inquiry are addressed.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Barr, G., & Herzog, H. (2000). Fetal pig: The high school dissection experience. Society and Animals, 8(1), 53-69. doi:10.1163/156853000510989

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: George Washington University, ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.

Hug, B. (2005). Dissection reconsidered: A reaction to de Villiers and Monk’s ‘The first cut is the deepest’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 601-606. doi:10.1080/00220270500061182

Mcintosh, A. V., & Richter, S. C. (2007). Digital daisy: An inquiry-based approach to investigating floral morphology and dissection. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 43(4), 15-21. doi:10.3200/sats.43.4.15-21

Predavec, M. (2001). Evaluation of e-rat, a computer-based rat dissection, in terms of student learning outcomes. Journal of Biological Education, 35(2), 75-80. doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655746

Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2011). Which type of inquiry project do high school biology students prefer: Open or guided? Research in Science Education, 42(5), 831-848. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9222-9

“Salmon and Sea Trout Facts.” Atlantic Salmon Trust, www.atlanticsalmontrust.org/salmon-and-sea-trout-facts/.

Shine, N. (2014, October 15). The battle over high school animal dissection. Retrieved January 22, 2019, from https://psmag.com/environment/battle-high-school-animal-dissection-92391

Solot, D., & Arluke, A. (1997). Learning the scientist’s role. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 26(1), 28-54. doi:10.1177/089124197026001002

Virtual frog dissection. Retrieved April 14, 2019, from http://www.mhhe.com/biosci/genbio/virtual_labs/BL_16/BL_16.html

Wallace, C. S., Tsoi, M. Y., Calkin, J., & Darley, M. (2003). Learning from inquiry-based laboratories in nonmajor biology: An interpretive study of the relationships among inquiry experience, epistemologies, and conceptual growth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 986-1024. doi:10.1002/tea.10127

Wilke, R. R. (2003). The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a human physiology course for nonmajors. Advances in Physiology Education, 27(4), 207-223. doi:10.1152/advan.00003.2002


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.